Eduardo González-Mora

PhD


Curriculum vitae



Ingeniería en Sistemas Energéticos Sustentables

Facultad de Ingeniería. UAEMéx



The productivity paradox


How ceasing to force output accelerated my research


November 14, 2025

The diagnosis
The common interpretation of stalled progress is a deficit of discipline. In reality, the core issue is frequently one of cognitive overload. An excess of concurrent deadlines, combined with the pervasive pressure of academic comparison, places the nervous system into a perpetual state of crisis management. We misdiagnose this systemic overwhelm as personal failure, labelling it procrastination when it is in fact a rational response to unsustainable demands.
The vicious cycle
A predictable pattern emerges: one overworks, leading to burnout, which generates guilt, which in turn propels a renewed and ultimately self-defeating effort to work harder. This is not a character flaw or a lack of willpower. It is the inevitable result of operating within a system that often equates busyness with virtue and rest with idleness—a system built upon a foundation of guilt.

The misplaced solution
The answer to this exhaustion is not a more sophisticated productivity application or a more rigid time-management system. The solution is space. Space to breathe, to think, to exist without performance metrics. Burnout does not stem from doing too little; it arises from the profound, grinding feeling of never being enough, regardless of one’s output.

A strategic shift
I ceased striving for forced productivity and implemented three fundamental changes.

  • Shift one: Tracking energy, not hours
    I abandoned the tyranny of logged hours and instead began monitoring my mental energy. If my cognitive resources were depleted, I would pause without guilt. If a spark of clarity or curiosity emerged, I would channel it into creative work. This single shift reclaimed months previously lost to the illusion of productivity—sitting at a desk while producing nothing of substance.
  • Shift two: Scheduling intellectual respites
    I began blocking out time for unstructured thought, treating these appointments with the same respect as professional meetings. These periods involved no laptop, no agenda, and no guilt. For me, playing the drums became a critical space for cognitive recovery. The essential task is to identify one’s own unique practice that facilitates mental restoration.
  • Shift three: dissociating self-worth from progress
    I learned to work without the corrosive influence of fear. This required a conscious effort to detach my sense of personal value from my daily, weekly, or even monthly research progress. I reframed my perspective: I was not falling behind; I was deliberately rebuilding a sustainable intellectual rhythm.

The Paradox Revealed
Herein lies the central paradox: the less one forcibly constrains the mind, the more readily it returns to a state of deep focus. Calm is not the antithesis of productivity; it is its fundamental prerequisite. Genuine productivity is not about maximising output from a besieged mind, but about working from a state of cognitive security and clarity. Calm is not indolence; it is focus, recovered and fortified.

It is critical to differentiate between two internal voices. Pressure insists, "You are not doing enough." Perseverance quietly observes, "You are still here—and that is enough." The first depletes you. The second sustains you. The ability to distinguish between them, and to choose wisely, may be the most important skill an academic ever cultivates. 


Tools
Translate to